In the volatile world of cryptocurrencies, custodian Prime Trust is teetering on the edge of a precipice. The business regulator of Nevada state has pointed out an alleged “deficit in the accounts of its clients”, triggering the issue of a cease and desist directive.
As per the business regulator’s findings, Prime Trust’s financial situation appears “alarmingly weak”, so much so that the firm is unable to honor its customer withdrawal requests.
The Department of Business and Industry in Nevada sounded the alarm on June 21, cautioning about Prime Trust’s “drastically deteriorated” financial condition, describing the firm’s situation as “potentially harmful” for its continued operation.
The department statement elaborated, “On June 21, 2023, the custodian found itself in a situation where it couldn’t meet the withdrawal requests of its clients, attributed to a lack of client funds and a significant financial liability shown on the company’s balance sheet that is owed to its clients.”
Furthermore, the directive accused Prime Trust of “grossly violating its fiduciary duties towards its customers by failing to properly protect assets under its care.” The department further alleged that the company is “incapable of satisfying all the withdrawal requests made by its customers.”
The company now has a month to reply to the cease and desist order. During this period, it has the option to request an administrative hearing to dispute the order.
In the event of Prime Trust failing to contest the order, the cease and desist order will be deemed final.
Earlier this month, on June 13, Banq, a payment subsidiary of Prime Trust, filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States.
Subsequently, on June 22, BitGo, a digital wallet infrastructure provider and digital asset custodian, announced its decision to withdraw from its planned acquisition of Prime Trust.
This recent episode involving Prime Trust serves as a stark reminder of the unpredictability and inherent risk associated with the crypto industry. Participants, both individuals, and businesses, need to be extremely cautious and undertake thorough due diligence when entering into transactions or partnerships with financial custodians in this sector.
Moreover, this instance underscores the crucial role of stringent regulatory oversight in the realm of cryptocurrencies. Regulatory bodies like Nevada’s Department of Business and Industry can play a vital role in pinpointing and curbing business malpractices, thus ensuring protection for customer interests.
These developments could potentially lead to a thorough reassessment of the regulatory practices surrounding cryptocurrency custodianship. As the world of crypto continues to evolve, we can expect more robust regulations to be introduced to protect customer assets and interests.